The Browns did not make enough plays

Cleveland Browns helmet logo

By STEVE KING

If you read the stuff in this space a lot — and I certainly hope you do, and thank you for that — then you know what I think of the Browns radio announcing team of play-by-play man Jim Donovan and color analyst Doug Dieken.

That is, they’re the best such duo in the NFL, and they know the Browns better than anyone else. Period.

So, then, when they say something about the Browns, you can take it to the bank.

After Sunday’s disappointing, frustrating 15-10 loss to Pittsburgh at FirstEnergy Stadium, Donovan and Dieken, in summing up the defeat, said, in essence, “The Browns didn’t make enough plays when they were there to be made, and the Steelers did.”

Yup, it is as simple as that.

All the talking heads will .. well, talk … about this, that and the other as being the reasons the Browns lost a game they should have won and let an inferior team beat them.

Yadda, yadda, yadda.

Blah, blah, blah.

You already know this: These NFL games are, for the most part, extremely close. There is not much separation between the vast majority of the teams, and the games bear that out. That includes the one against the Steelers.

With that, it boils down to who makes more plays throughout the games, but especially — especially! — in the fourth quarter, when most of the games are decided. Give the Steelers credit. They hung in there. They made the plays, The Browns didn’t, both offensive and defensively.

After the Browns built a 10-3 lead, the defense allowed Pittsburgh to make two long touchdown drives to go ahead.

When the Browns offense was trying to get some TDs of its own, the effort was derailed by mistake after mistake — a fumble, dropped passes, not hitting open receivers, penalties. etc.

You can’t win like that, and the Browns didn’t. So, it’s hardly a shock that they lost.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail